Was Noah’s Flood Worldwide or Local?








Steve, I’m married to someone who believes that the contents of the Bible are the infallible Word of God.  He therefore claims that the entire globe was flooded during Noah’s flood.  This makes no sense to me.  What do you think?

Steve’s Answer:

I, too, believe the Bible is the infallible Word of God.  You just have to read it in proper context in order to properly understand it.  Context is everything when studying God’s Word.

That’s why I’ve posted so many Bible studies to the Have Ye Not Read? website, which is designed to help people understand some of the more controversial Bible topics.

Earth v/s Land

The original manuscripts from which the book of Genesis was translated do not say the entire earth was flooded. By context, they say that the land the descendants of Adam and Eve lived in was flooded.  Not the entire globe.  But the entire geographic region the Adamites lived in.

The idea that the entire globe was flooded during Noah’s flood comes about largely because of the mistranslation of one of the Hebrew words for “earth” (i.e., erets) as well as the phrase “the whole earth” in Genesis chapters 7 and 8.

In those chapters, the word translated “earth” should have been translated “land” instead.  Here’s an example of where it was improperly translated “earth”:

Gen 8:9  But the dove found no rest for the sole of her foot, and she returned unto him into the ark, for the waters were on the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark.

Any reasonable person reading that verse without giving it much thought would agree that the “whole earth,” meaning the globe, had been flooded.

However, the word translated “earth” in this passage is the Hebrew word erets (i.e., Strong’s Concordance #H-776).

That word indeed means “earth,” but in many variations. For example, it can mean the entire globe, but it can also mean a specific chunk of ground, a specific area of land, a specific country or nation, or even simply a field.

Here’s the definition from Strong’s Concordance so you can see it for yourself:





From an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively, a land): –    X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X nations, way, + wilderness, world.

As you can see, the Hebrew word erets can indeed refer to the entire earth.  But it can also refer to “partitively, a land.”

In other words, it can refer to any individual part of the earth. It can even mean a field, or just a specific chunk of ground (for example, see Ezekiel 29:5 where erets is translated “the field”).

The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament points out that the Hebrew word erets can also be translated (depending upon context) in many ways, including:

1b) land

1b1) country, territory

1b2) district, region

1b3) tribal territory

1b4) piece of ground

1b5) land of Canaan, Israel

1b6) inhabitants of land

1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world

1b8) city (-state)

1c) ground, surface of the earth

1c1) ground

1c2) soil

So because of its multiple and nuanced meanings, the Hebrew word erets has to be translated according to the context of the surrounding verses in which it occurs.

And there are two vital points of context in the Bible account of Noah’s flood that I’d like to point out as I make my case that the flood of Noah was definitely not worldwide.

The First Vital Point of Context

The first vital point of context that’s critical to grasp is this:

Putting two of every animal on the face of the earth into Noah’s Ark would have been a physical and logistical impossibility.  After all, modern science tells us that there are 7.77 million species of animals, of which 953,434 have been described and cataloged.  Let’s forget about the 7.7 million species, and just stick with the scientifically cataloged 953,434 species.  Two of each of those animals would equal 1,906,868 animals on a single boat.  That’s one million, nine hundred and six thousand, eight hundreds and sixty eight animals, all being cared for by eight people!

And don’t forget that God told Noah to take more than two of certain animals.  For example, He told Noah to take seven each of all clean animals, meaning all animals that can be used for food and sacrifice (Genesis 7:2).  Plus the “fowls of the air” were to be taken in groups of seven each (Genesis 7:3).  So, in reality, there would have had to have been multiple millions of animals on that ark, if the entire globe had actually been flooded.

The bottom line is that there’s never been a boat big enough to hold two of every animal on the face of the earth.  Not in the entirety of human history has there been such a boat.  Noah’s Ark, for example, was approximately 450 x 75 x 45 feet in size, while the Titanic was 850 x 92 x 64 feet in size.  Even the Titanic couldn’t have held a tiny fraction of the animal species existing on the entire earth.

This is why, for centuries, scientists have ridiculed the story of Noah’s flood.  They know it would be physically impossible to put two of every animal species in the world (plus seven of some species) — along with enough food and water to feed them for months on end– onto a single boat, particularly one with the stated dimensions of Noah’s Ark (Genesis 6:15).

So the context in which the word erets is used in the Biblical account of Noah’s flood cannot possibly be a worldwide context.  Instead, by simple logic and common sense, it had to be a far more localized flood, meaning a flood of the Mesopotamian Valley the descendants of Adam and Eve lived in.

Adam and Eve’s descendants, at that time, lived in the Mesopotamian Valley, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers — an area also known as the “Fertile Crescent” because of the abundant crops that could be grown there.

And putting onto the ark two of every local animal species living in that valley would have been quite possible, indeed.

The Second Vital Point of Context

The second point of context that’s so often overlooked is this:

The flood of Noah was designed by God to drown the progeny of the fallen angels who had mated with the daughters of Adam and Eve in Genesis 6:1–5, creating a hybrid race of very wicked individuals who were also gigantic in size compared to normal humans.

As you’ll see in the verses below, that act of mixing with the fallen angels, over time, had corrupted the entire Adamic bloodline except for Noah’s family.

Let’s take a quick look.  As it’s written:

Gen 6:1  And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

Gen 6:2
  That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

I’ll stop here for just a moment to explain that the word “earth” in verse 1 above is not translated from the Hebrew word erets, but instead, from the Hebrew word adamah (i.e., Strong’s H-127), which quite literally refers to the local soil, not the globe.  Here’s how it looks in the Strong’s Concordance:





From H119; soil (from its general redness): – country, earth, ground, husband [-man] (-ry), land.

In other words, this is the same soil from which Adamic man was formed by God in Genesis 2:7, where the word adamah is correctly translated “the ground.”

It’s also important to note that the phrase “daughters of men” in Genesis 6:2 above should have been translated “daughters of the man Adam.”

Indeed, as Dr. Bullinger correctly points out in his marginal notes in the Companion Bible, in the original Hebrew, the word translated “men” in that verse is from the Hebrew phrase ha-’adham, which quite literally means, “the man Adam.”

So it was not mankind in general (i.e., the various races) that lived and multiplied in that great Mesopotamian Valley where the flood took place, but instead, the descendants of “the man Adam.”

When the fallen angels came to this earth, as described in great detail in the Book of Enoch, they purposely targeted the descendants of Adam and Eve, knowing that the Messiah would ultimately be born through that specific bloodline.

Why did they target the descendants of Adam and Eve?  Their goal was to genetically taint that chosen Adamic bloodline so the Messiah could not be born through it.  They were trying to circumvent God’s great Plan for salvation through His long-promised Messiah.

So the fallen angels (i.e., “sons of God”) saw those daughters of Adam, and “took them wives of all which they chose.”

As you’ll see next, over the long course of time this led to a state in which the entire Adamic bloodline — with the notable exception of Noah’s family — had become intermixed with the fallen angels, creating a wicked hybrid race that utterly despised God.  Let’s continue:

Gen 6:3  And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

Gen 6:4
  There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

Gen 6:5
  And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Gen 6:6
  And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.

Gen 6:7
  And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

Gen 6:8
  But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.

In each of the verses directly above, there are two different Hebrew words being translated “earth.”

One of them is the Hebrew word erets (verses 4, 5 and 6) which we’ve already looked at, and which should have been translated “land.”  And the other one is the Hebrew word adamah (in verse 7) which we’ve also already looked at, and which should have been translated “soil” or “ground” as it is in Genesis 2:7.

Nowhere in these verses is the entire globe being referred to.

As you can see from verses 4-7 above, the fallen angels created a real mess.   With the exception of Noah and his family, all Adamic flesh had corrupted their bloodline by mating with the fallen angels.  They had all become genetic hybrids.

This is why, in II Peter 2:5, the geographical area of Noah’s flood is referred to as “the world of the ungodly,” with the Greek word for “world” (i.e., kosmos) meaning, “the world, in a wide or narrow sense…”

In other words, by context it was not the entire world, but only that narrow section of the world in which the ungodly act of mating with fallen angels was taking place.

Keep in mind that the Adamic race is the genetic bloodline through which Christ Jesus was to come, and He had to be perfect in His lineage or He could not be the saving Messiah of God.  Biblically speaking, He couldn’t come from a mixed or hybrid lineage.  He had to be purely Adamic, and not of any other race.

Why Did Noah Find Grace?

So why, in Genesis 6:8 above, did Noah “find grace in the eyes of the Lord?”  Genesis 6:9 gives us the answer:

Gen 6:9  These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.

The first use of the word “generations” in the verse above is translated from the Hebrew word toledah (i.e., Strong’s H-8435), meaning “family descent.”   So we can see that the subject matter is Noah’s family genealogy.

In the original Hebrew, the phrase “perfect in his generations” means “without blemish in his posterity” or “undefiled in his posterity” (see Strong’s H-8549 and H-1755)   Noah’s bloodline (genealogy) was undefiled, meaning neither he nor his family had wickedly mixed with the fallen angels.

In other words, Noah and his family were the last Adamic people alive in that great Mesopotamian Valley with an unblemished bloodline.  They  were pure bloodline Adamites, while all others had, over time, mixed with the fallen angels hoping to become “as gods,” precisely as Satan the serpent had promised Eve in Genesis 3:5.

Thus, with the exception of Noah and his family, Adam’s descendants had become genetic hybrids.

Finally, in Genesis 6:9 above we see the phrase “Noah walked with God,” which is a Hebrew euphemism meaning Noah ordered his steps, or his way of life, in accord with God’s way.

Yes, Noah understood that the Messiah would eventually come through the bloodline of Adam and Eve, and would have to be genetically perfect.  So while all of the other Adamites were mixing with the fallen angels, Noah made sure himself and his family were of perfect pedigree, meaning of an unblemished bloodline.

In other words, Noah and his three sons and their wives were the only family left in that great Mesopotamian Valley that had not wickedly mixed with the fallen angels or with their “giant” progeny.  Noah and his family stuck with God and followed His Word and His ways.  This is why Noah is referred to as “a preacher (or, herald) of righteousness” in II Peter 2:5.

So God flooded that Mesopotamian Valley in which the hybrid progeny of the fallen angels lived.  He wiped out every descendant of Adam and Eve that had wickedly intermixed with the fallen angels, which was everyone but Noah and his family.

But first He ordered Noah to build a large ark and round up two of every local specie of animal and place them on the ark. Why? So this very same geographical area could be repopulated with its own native species after the flood was over.

Noah, his wife, his three sons and their wives (i.e., only eight people in total; I Peter 3:20) were saved, in order to repopulate that specific area of the earth that had been flooded. And the male and female pairs of animals they took on the ark were saved for the same purpose.

In other words, God used the flood to wipe out the gigantic half-Adamic/half-angelic hybrids living in that great Mesopotamian Valley.  And He then used Noah and his family to repopulate that same area after the flood.  It’s that simple.

So when you take the account of Noah’s flood in its proper context, you can see that the phrase “whole earth” in Genesis 8:9, which we looked at earlier, should have been translated “whole land,” or perhaps “whole country” or “whole area.” The flood was definitely not global.

Other Times “Whole Earth” Was Used
of a Limited Geographic Area

As further evidence for this, consider the following two verses from quite another book of the Bible altogether:

Exo 10:14  And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the coasts of Egypt: very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such.

Exo 10:15
  For they covered the face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened; and they did eat every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left: and there remained not any green thing in the trees, or in the herbs of the field, through all the land of Egypt.

In Exodus 10:15 above, we find that very same phrase “whole earth,” translated from the exact same Hebrew words used of Noah’s flood in Genesis 8:9. The locusts of verse 14 are said in verse 15 to have “covered the face of the whole earth.”

But by taking verse 15 in proper context with verse 14 before it, it becomes abundantly clear that the Scriptural passage is talking about the entire land of Egypt, and not the entire globe.

So once again, the phrase “the whole earth” in verse 15 should have been translated “the whole land” or “the whole country” or “the whole area.” How the translators missed that, I’ll never understand. But it’s as clear as a bell for anyone willing to look at the very clear context from verse 14, and give it some thought.

Likewise, the following verse from the great book of Jeremiah uses that same phrase, “the whole earth,” yet it’s clear from the context that it’s discussing only the land of Babylon, and not the entire globe:

Jeremiah 50:23  How is the hammer of the whole earth cut asunder and broken! how is Babylon become a desolation among the nations!

In Jeremiah’s time, Babylon did not cover the “whole earth.”  Nor has it ever.  Indeed, it was located in that same Mesopotamian Valley in which Noah’s flood had taken place centuries earlier.  So by context, the phrase “the whole earth” is referring solely to that geographic area of land upon which the nation of Babylon was situated.

So again, context is everything when translating the Hebrew word erets. And in many cases the Biblical translators did a very poor job of utilizing the context when they translated the word. In areas where it should have been translated “whole land” or “whole country” or “whole area” it was incorrectly translated “whole earth,” wrongly implying the entire earth, or the globe.

As another example of why it’s so important to consider the context when translating a word, here’s a verse in which the very same phrase “the whole earth” is, by context, actually referencing the entire globe:

Psalms 72:19  And blessed be his glorious name for ever: and let the whole earth be filled with his glory; Amen, and Amen.

And here’s another verse in which that same phrase references the entire globe:

Zechariah 4:14  Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the Lord of the whole earth.

As you can see, the context of both of those verses is global, because God is, indeed, the God of the entire globe.  After all, He created it in Genesis 1:1.

So once again, context is everything when translating that Hebrew word erets. It can mean the entire earth, or it can mean a very specific area of land located somewhere on the earth, as it does in the Genesis account of Noah’s flood.

The bottom line is that God used the flood of Noah to wipe out those wicked hybrid “giants” that had corrupted the entire Adamic bloodline with the exception of Noah and his family.

Yes, God saved Noah and His family so the Messiah could eventually come through their progeny with an unblemished bloodline. But He drowned the hybrids in the flood.

So the “whole earth” was not flooded.  For example, the Chinese are still with us, today. The blacks of Africa are still with us.  Many other races that lived in different parts of the world at that time are still with us.

So the flood could not have reached them. It was confined to that broad and very fertile Mesopotamian Valley that the descendants of Adam and Eve had happily lived in until they allowed their bloodline to be corrupted by the fallen angels of Genesis chapter 6 in their wicked and vain hope of becoming “as the gods.”

Regards in Christ,

Steve Barwick


Steve Barwick

Sign up here to receive notifications of Steve’s News & Current Events Commentaries, as well as notifications when new in-depth Bible studies are posted.  You’ll also receive a free copy of Steve’ in-depth Bible study, The Four Parts of God’s Plan, when you sign up.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This